Why AI Won’t Replace Strategic UX Researchers (But Will Change How We Work)

Welcome to insights and stories from our wonderful UXPA Community! This new blog series is dedicated to showcasing our members and interesting UX topics. Our goal is to bring together various viewpoints from fellow UXers all over the globe. If you’d like to participate, please email volunteers@uxpa.org.

The rapid acceleration of AI in the tech industry has sparked a familiar question: Will AI take my job?

A recent Financial Times article titled, “Why hasn’t AI taken your job yet?,” offers a compelling answer: complexity. It’s in the ambiguity, nuance, and messy reality of human behavior that our value as UX researchers becomes clear.

AI tools are increasingly adept at automating repetitive tasks and surfacing patterns. But what they can’t do, at least not yet, is navigate the political, emotional, and strategic dimensions of product development.

As AI begins to automate more tactical workflows, I’ve noticed a shift. Researchers who operate as task executors, answering isolated questions or validating predetermined ideas, are more vulnerable. But those who:

They are not resilient, they're becoming essential.

This idea was reinforced while listening to a recent Learner’s podcast episode featuring Judd Antin and Alec Levin. One powerful insight stood out: asking leaders to seek disconfirming evidence genuinely is incredibly hard. Why? Because leaders are under constant pressure to deliver results, appear confident, and validate existing assumptions to keep momentum.

The result is something Antin calls “safety blanket research” — studies that exist to confirm what people already believe. But, impact research requires more than validation. It calls for a commitment to falsification, to the uncomfortable process of challenging assumptions and embracing complexity.

The most meaningful insights happen when researchers:

Too often, organizations fall into two traps: research that confirms biases or research that is rigorous, but never gets applied. The sweet spot lies in the middle, where we use our tools, intuition, and relationships to uncover truths that matter — and push our teams forward.

Here lies the paradox: the more contextual, collaborative, and courageous your role is, the harder it is to automate. Our strength isn’t in speed, but in asking the hard questions and knowing how to make the answers count.

So as AI reshapes our workflows, the bar for impact rises. The question is not whether researchers understand falsification, but whether we’re ready to live it, especially when the truth is hard to hear.

What skills are you developing to stay?

How are you pushing your research to drive real, strategic change ?

The Future-Proof UX Researcher_Tumminelli
Giulia Tumminelli (Photo)

Giulia Tumminelli

About Giulia

I’m Giulia, a mixed-methods Senior Researcher.

I cut through noise by transforming qualitative and quantitative data into impactful product decisions.

With more than seven years of experience in the tech industry, I understand exactly what empowers product teams to make confident, informed decisions that lead to product success!

My specialties are:

If you want to chat about UX Research and beyond, you can find me on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/giulia-tumminelli/.

References

Burn-Murdoch, J. (2025, March 28). Why hasn’t AI taken your job yet?. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/471b53ba-2a71-4650-a019-e8d4065b78a0

Levin, A. (Host). (2025, March 3). Doing the Research with Judd Antin (Ep. 26) [Video podcast episode]. In The Learners Podcast. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFYCyO2g2ik

Item added to cart.
0 items - $0.00